Spinoza's empty law : the possibility of political theology

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The evolution of how power is both understood and exercised can be explained in two ways or two distinct narratives. According to the first one, power articulates itself by seeking justification through its relation to the law. I will refer to this as the juridical conception of power. According to the second one, the exercise of power cannot be justified with recourse to the law. I will refer to this as agonistic power because it expresses itself through its antagonism towards juridical power. Clearly, the juridical model has been the dominant one in the Western tradition: that is, in any conception whereby power is different from kingship. However, the agonistic power forms a strong current in the intellectual tradition, one that includes Marx and Nietzsche in the nineteenth century, as well as French post-structuralists such as Foucault, Derrida and Deleuze, and the Frankfurt School and Walter Benjamin in Germany.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSpinoza Beyond Philosophy
    EditorsBeth Lord
    Place of PublicationU.K.
    PublisherEdinburgh University Press
    Pages135-148
    Number of pages14
    ISBN (Print)9780748644803
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • agonistic power
    • constitutional law
    • sovereignty

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Spinoza's empty law : the possibility of political theology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this