Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Spontaneous synchronization between repetitive speech and rhythmic gesture

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

Abstract

Although studies have described how motion in diverse biological systems may spontaneously synchronize it is not known whether speech and gesture exhibit such a property. Previous research on the coordination of speech and gesture has focused on pointing or tapping tasks, the structure of which may regulate speech and gesture dynamics. Here we examined whether synchronies might arise between a repetitive utterance and rhythmic finger movement oscillations in a non-intentional paradigm. Participants were instructed to repeatedly utter /ba/ or /sa/ syllables with/without vocalizing, while continuously moving their right index finger in flexion/extension. No instructions about synchronization were given; participants were only told to adopt the most comfortable motions. We expected that the larger amplitude of face motion for /ba/ syllables and vocalized speech would lead to greater influence on the gesture. In contrast, the results showed more synchronization for /sa/ and when syllables were articulated silently. Less perceptive feedback may lead to a reduction in the robustness of the speech component, making it more susceptible to gesture influence.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory-Visual Speech Processing, 29 August - 1 September 2013, Annecy, France
PublisherInria
Pages17-20
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 2013
EventInternational Conference on Auditory-Visual Speech Processing -
Duration: 29 Aug 2013 → …

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Print)2308-975X

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Auditory-Visual Speech Processing
Period29/08/13 → …

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spontaneous synchronization between repetitive speech and rhythmic gesture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this