Stakeholders' views of shared learning models in general practice : a national survey

Thea van de Mortel, Peter Silberberg, Christine Ahern, Sabrina Pit

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: The number of learners requiring general practice placements creates supervisory capacity constraints. This research examined how a shared learning model may affect training capacity. Methods: A national anonymous online survey of Australian general practitioner (GP) supervisors, GP registrars, prevocational trainees and medical students was conducted. Results: A total of 1122 surveys were completed: 75% of learners had participated in shared learning; 25% of multi-level learner practices were not using shared learning. Learners were positive about shared learning (4.3-4.4/5), considering it an effective way to learn that created training capacity (4.1-4.2/5). 79-88% of learners preferred a mixture of oneto-one teaching and shared learning. Supervisors thought shared learning was more cost- and time-efficient, and created training capacity (4.3-4.4/5). Discussion: Shared learning models have the potential to increase GP training capacity. Many practices are not utilising shared learning, representing capacity loss. Regional training providers should emphasise positive aspects of shared learning to facilitate uptake.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)633-638
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustralian Family Physician
    Volume43
    Issue number9
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • education
    • general practice
    • mentors
    • questionnaires

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholders' views of shared learning models in general practice : a national survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this