Standard Versus Ultrasound-Guided Radial and Femoral Access (SURF) : a randomised controlled trial

P. Nguyen, A. Makris, A. Hennessy, S. Jayanti, A. Wang, K. Park, V. Chen, T. Nguyen, S. Lo, W. Xuan, M. Leung, T. Badie, J. Xu, K. Kadappu, H. Kachwalla, O. Gibbs, A. Faour, A. Kee, R. Rajaratnam, D. LeungJ. French, C. Juergens

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

Abstract

![CDATA[This study compared outcomes in unselectedpatients undergoing cardiac catheterisation via transradial(TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) and also standard (SD)versus ultrasound (US) guidance.]]
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAbstracts for the 67th Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting, the International Society for Heart Research Australasian Section Annual Scientific Meeting and the 13th Annual Australia and New Zealand Endovascular Therapies Meeting, 8 - 11 August 2019, Adelaide, Australia
PublisherElsevier Australia
PagesS428-S428
Number of pages1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventAustralia and New Zealand Endovascular Therapies. Annual Meeting -
Duration: 1 Jan 2019 → …

Conference

ConferenceAustralia and New Zealand Endovascular Therapies. Annual Meeting
Period1/01/19 → …

Keywords

  • clinical trials
  • cardiac catheterization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standard Versus Ultrasound-Guided Radial and Femoral Access (SURF) : a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this