Abstract
Stigma of contaminated land is caused by risk perception and has an uncertain nature. It is proposed to assess stigma impacts using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. In this regard, a model is constructed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. The case study shows that the MCDM approach has provided a logical and structured framework to process relevant criteria and it is feasible to apply this method to assess the required stigma adjustment factor.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Pacific Rim Property Research Journal |
Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Keywords
- contaminated land
- stigma
- multi-criteria decision-making
- analytic hierarchy process
- risk perception
- margin of error