Strengths, compliance, or deficits: examining professional viewpoints on the ‘realistic possibility of reunification’ for parents with children in care

Betty Luu, Susan Collings, Sarah Ciftci, Meredith McLaine

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This pilot study explored child protection and out-of-home care workers’ perspectives on factors influencing likelihood of reunification. In a Q-sort task, thirty participants ranked 28 statements about reunification. Factor analysis identified three viewpoints. Over half of participants aligned with a strengths-focused viewpoint, emphasizing collaboration and parents’ capacity for change. One-third were compliance-focused, prioritizing adherence to institutional directives and downplaying complexities of parents’ needs. The remainder were deficit-focused, holding pessimistic views and emphasizing past failures. Findings highlight need for systemic changes to build strengths-based practices and move beyond ritualistic compliance. Further research can address decision-making biases and promote trauma-informed family-centered practice.

    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages25
    JournalJournal of Public Child Welfare
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2025

    Keywords

    • Child protection
    • decision-making
    • permanency
    • Q-sort methodology
    • restoration
    • reunification

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Strengths, compliance, or deficits: examining professional viewpoints on the ‘realistic possibility of reunification’ for parents with children in care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this