Abstract
This pilot study explored child protection and out-of-home care workers’ perspectives on factors influencing likelihood of reunification. In a Q-sort task, thirty participants ranked 28 statements about reunification. Factor analysis identified three viewpoints. Over half of participants aligned with a strengths-focused viewpoint, emphasizing collaboration and parents’ capacity for change. One-third were compliance-focused, prioritizing adherence to institutional directives and downplaying complexities of parents’ needs. The remainder were deficit-focused, holding pessimistic views and emphasizing past failures. Findings highlight need for systemic changes to build strengths-based practices and move beyond ritualistic compliance. Further research can address decision-making biases and promote trauma-informed family-centered practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Child Welfare |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Child protection
- decision-making
- permanency
- Q-sort methodology
- restoration
- reunification
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Strengths, compliance, or deficits: examining professional viewpoints on the ‘realistic possibility of reunification’ for parents with children in care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver