TY - JOUR
T1 - Striving for best practice in environmental governance and justice : reporting on the inaugural Environmental Democracy Index for Australia
AU - Dwyer, Guy J.
AU - Preston, Judith A.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - International environmental law has exerted, and continues to exert, a significant influence over the development of domestic environmental laws in Australia. Instruments such as the Rio Declaration and the Aarhus Convention are widely accepted by stakeholders as providing international standards of best practice for environmental governance. During the past, however, it has often been difficult for commentators to assess the effectiveness of domestic efforts at implementing these international standards of best practice with any degree of precision. With this in mind, The Access Initiative and the World Resources Institute have recently attempted to address this problem by creating a tool that tests the extent to which domestic environmental laws at the national level have been harmonised with international standards of best practice for access to information, public participation and access to justice in areas related to the environment as reflected in the UNEP Bali Guidelines. The tool also offers a snapshot of a nation's performance in key practice areas of environmental governance. This tool is known as the Environmental Democracy Index. In May 2015, the inaugural Environmental Democracy Index project will be launched. In this article, the authors, both of whom were involved in the research and preparation of Australia's country profile for the Environmental Democracy Index project, report on Australia's performance. The authors also outline a series of recommendations for improving Australia's index score in the future.
AB - International environmental law has exerted, and continues to exert, a significant influence over the development of domestic environmental laws in Australia. Instruments such as the Rio Declaration and the Aarhus Convention are widely accepted by stakeholders as providing international standards of best practice for environmental governance. During the past, however, it has often been difficult for commentators to assess the effectiveness of domestic efforts at implementing these international standards of best practice with any degree of precision. With this in mind, The Access Initiative and the World Resources Institute have recently attempted to address this problem by creating a tool that tests the extent to which domestic environmental laws at the national level have been harmonised with international standards of best practice for access to information, public participation and access to justice in areas related to the environment as reflected in the UNEP Bali Guidelines. The tool also offers a snapshot of a nation's performance in key practice areas of environmental governance. This tool is known as the Environmental Democracy Index. In May 2015, the inaugural Environmental Democracy Index project will be launched. In this article, the authors, both of whom were involved in the research and preparation of Australia's country profile for the Environmental Democracy Index project, report on Australia's performance. The authors also outline a series of recommendations for improving Australia's index score in the future.
KW - Australia
KW - environmental law
KW - environmental law, international
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:32820
UR - https://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I7ab0283cf9fb11e4bb04ba2c9793820d
M3 - Article
SN - 0813-300X
VL - 32
SP - 202
EP - 255
JO - Environmental and Planning Law Journal
JF - Environmental and Planning Law Journal
IS - 3
ER -