Student-chosen criteria for peer assessment of tertiary rock groups in rehearsal and performance : what's important?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The study investigates criteria chosen by music students for peer and self assessment of both the rehearsal process and performance outcome of their rock groups. The student-chosen criteria and their explanations of these criteria were analysed in relation to Birkett’s skills taxonomy of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ skills. In the rehearsal process, students placed an emphasis on ‘soft’ skill issues, and in the performance outcome, on ‘hard’ skill issues. For students and staff, challenges raised include understanding how and whether to assess ‘soft’ skills; that there is a continuum of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ skills rather than a binary; and ensuring clear understanding of criteria terms.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-43
    Number of pages19
    JournalBritish Journal of Music Education
    Volume29
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • ability
    • music rehearsals
    • performance
    • rock groups
    • university students

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Student-chosen criteria for peer assessment of tertiary rock groups in rehearsal and performance : what's important?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this