Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Student-chosen criteria for peer assessment of tertiary rock groups in rehearsal and performance : what's important?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study investigates criteria chosen by music students for peer and self assessment of both the rehearsal process and performance outcome of their rock groups. The student-chosen criteria and their explanations of these criteria were analysed in relation to Birkett's skills taxonomy of 'soft' and 'hard' skills. In the rehearsal process, students placed an emphasis on 'soft' skill issues, and in the performance outcome, on 'hard' skill issues. For students and staff, challenges raised include understanding how and whether to assess 'soft' skills; that there is a continuum of 'soft' and 'hard' skills rather than a binary; and ensuring clear understanding of criteria terms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-43
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Music Education
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • ability
  • music rehearsals
  • performance
  • rock groups
  • university students

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Student-chosen criteria for peer assessment of tertiary rock groups in rehearsal and performance : what's important?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this