TY - JOUR
T1 - Super-nonlinear models of charged aerosol detectors
T2 - the physicochemical limits of linearization and quantification
AU - Cravino, Jake A.
AU - Nawiesniak, Jude
AU - Karlsen, Christopher E.
AU - Soliven, Arianne
AU - Thomas, Richard
AU - Shallliker, R. Andrew
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Charged Aerosol Detectors (CADs) have become essential tools in modern analytical laboratories due to their near-universal applicability and ease of use. Despite their advantages, CADs exhibit a nonlinear response to analyte concentration, commonly addressed by applying power function transformations to calibration data. However, this practice can lead to overfitting. In this work, we present a theoretical model that describes the intrinsic nonlinearity of CAD peak height response as a function of analyte concentration. The model fits the empirically determined optimal power functions and reveals that CADs are not only non-linear but also cannot be globally linearized with a single power function and thus are ‘super-nonlinear’. By way of experimentation, we verify this super-nonlinear model of the CAD and assess its implications for quantitative assays undertaken using CADs. We find that the power function required to linearise calibration data varies with sample load, and that if global linearization is applied, quantification errors can be as high as 8%. However, when local linearization is used, errors drop to ∼1%. This work advances the physical understanding of CAD response behavior and supports more informed calibration practices.
AB - Charged Aerosol Detectors (CADs) have become essential tools in modern analytical laboratories due to their near-universal applicability and ease of use. Despite their advantages, CADs exhibit a nonlinear response to analyte concentration, commonly addressed by applying power function transformations to calibration data. However, this practice can lead to overfitting. In this work, we present a theoretical model that describes the intrinsic nonlinearity of CAD peak height response as a function of analyte concentration. The model fits the empirically determined optimal power functions and reveals that CADs are not only non-linear but also cannot be globally linearized with a single power function and thus are ‘super-nonlinear’. By way of experimentation, we verify this super-nonlinear model of the CAD and assess its implications for quantitative assays undertaken using CADs. We find that the power function required to linearise calibration data varies with sample load, and that if global linearization is applied, quantification errors can be as high as 8%. However, when local linearization is used, errors drop to ∼1%. This work advances the physical understanding of CAD response behavior and supports more informed calibration practices.
KW - Charged aerosol detector
KW - Data linearization
KW - Power functions
KW - Super non-linear detectors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105027468145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.microc.2026.116859
DO - 10.1016/j.microc.2026.116859
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105027468145
SN - 0026-265X
VL - 221
JO - Microchemical Journal
JF - Microchemical Journal
M1 - 116859
ER -