Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Targeted education on the topic of professional boundaries does not change student physiotherapists’ opinions or their responses to a series of ethical scenarios

  • Ian Cooper
  • , Clare Delany
  • , Genevieve Dwyer
  • , Rosemary Godbold
  • , Venerina Johnston
  • , Debra Shirley
  • , Susan Jenkins
  • Curtin University
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
  • University of Melbourne
  • Auckland University of Technology
  • University of Queensland
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of Western Australia

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recognizing and maintaining professional boundaries within physiotherapy/patient relationships is a cornerstone of the Australian and New Zealand Standards of Physiotherapy.Citation1,Citation2 Codes of conduct set down by regulatory authorities and professional associations stipulate the parameters of a professional physiotherapy relationship.Citation3–Citation7 Despite these written codes and regulations which explicitly prohibit exploitive relationships between physiotherapists and their patients, it is apparent physiotherapists may feel uncertain about, and hold diverse beliefs and understandings, as to what constitutes a professional relationship and this may, in part, contribute to boundary violations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-438
Number of pages8
JournalPhysical Therapy Reviews
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Targeted education on the topic of professional boundaries does not change student physiotherapists’ opinions or their responses to a series of ethical scenarios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this