Termination laws in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: do they align with midwives' scope of practice?

Susanne Armour, Bashi Hazard, Hazel Keedle, Andrea Gilkison, Hannah Dahlen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines whether the current termination laws of Australiaand Aotearoa New Zealand align with the midwifery scope of practice. Itbegins with an introduction to termination of pregnancy from a health careperspective. An overview of previous and current legal frameworks in Australiaand Aotearoa New Zealand that impact upon the provision of terminationof pregnancy health services is provided. Midwives' scope of practice isexplained and the legal and administrative factors obstructing midwives'ability to work to their full scope are discussed. Midwives' needs to enablethe provision of termination care are considered. The article concludes thatthe current laws are not supportive of midwives as termination care providersand their needs to realise their full scope of practice are not being met.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-538
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
Volume31
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Termination laws in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: do they align with midwives' scope of practice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this