Abstract
In April 2008, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) was informed of the possible downgrading of its "A" status within the UN system, due to its apparent failure to comply with the Paris Principles relating to the status of national human rights institutions. This article explores this threat to downgrade SUHAKAM and the actions which it stimulated on the part of the Malaysian government and SUHAKAM itself. It argues that despite expectations by government and civil society at the time of its establishment, SUHAKAM has directly challenged government on major human rights issues on a number of occasions. At the same time, it has had difficulty persuading government to give effect to its recommendations and has as a consequence drawn strong criticism from civil society for failing to protect human rights that are within the government's power to rectify.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 165-198 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of International Law |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the mettle of National Human Rights Institutions : a case study of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver