Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Testing the mettle of National Human Rights Institutions : a case study of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In April 2008, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) was informed of the possible downgrading of its "A" status within the UN system, due to its apparent failure to comply with the Paris Principles relating to the status of national human rights institutions. This article explores this threat to downgrade SUHAKAM and the actions which it stimulated on the part of the Malaysian government and SUHAKAM itself. It argues that despite expectations by government and civil society at the time of its establishment, SUHAKAM has directly challenged government on major human rights issues on a number of occasions. At the same time, it has had difficulty persuading government to give effect to its recommendations and has as a consequence drawn strong criticism from civil society for failing to protect human rights that are within the government's power to rectify.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)165-198
    Number of pages34
    JournalAsian Journal of International Law
    Volume1
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the mettle of National Human Rights Institutions : a case study of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this