The alchemy of global emissions trading scheme (GETS) : speculation and regulation

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    Abstract

    We develop an interactive framework to model speculation (over regulation) and regulation (of speculation) in a greenhouse gas (GHG) permits market. In our proposed model, big traders engage in speculation by strategically withholding and releasing permits to influence the temporal path qf permit prices in order to maximize their profits. The national government/regulator has an incentive to stabilize permit prices by suitably manipulating stocks of permits. Thus, the GHG permits market can typically be characterized by circular interdependence in which big traders will be "gaming" the regulator to generate profits: the state of the market affects speculative behavior of traders that in turn impacts on government's behavior, which in turn impacts on the state of the market. The interactive framework explores the gaming between speculators and a regulator, or government, to shed crucial insights on the nature of equilibrium in possible global emissions trading schemes (GETS). By so doing, we are able to unravel potential pitfilils of any global trading system in pollution permits for arresting global warming. Once policy makers are aware of these pitfalls, for example, a "culture of speculation" as opposed to a culture of safety, they can devise a suitable mechanism to bypass these potential pitfalls.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCooperation for a Peaceful and Sustainable World
    EditorsChen Bo, Manas Chatterji, Hao Chaoyan
    Place of PublicationU.K.
    PublisherEmerald
    Pages117-147
    Number of pages31
    ISBN (Print)9781781903353
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • global emissions trading schemes
    • government policy
    • greenhouse gases
    • regulation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The alchemy of global emissions trading scheme (GETS) : speculation and regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this