The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny

Herbert W. Marsh, Kit-Tai Hau, Rhonda Craven

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    56 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Responds to comments made by Dai (see record 2004-14303-011) and Plucker et al (200414303-012) on the current authors' original article (see record 2003-06802-005) on the big-fish--little-pond effect (BFLPE). In its simplest form the BFLPE predicts that equally able students have lower academic self-concepts when attending schools where the average ability levels of other students is high than when attending schools where the school-average ability is low. The authors argue that there is extremely strong support for internal validity, external validity, generalizability and policy-practice implications of the BFLPE and that it stands up to critical scrutiny. The article discusses long-lasting effects of the BFLPE and important educational outcomes, reflected-glory effects (RGEs), theoretical predictions. From social comparison theory, and policy implications, and the authors urge parents to think carefully about the implications of school placements and policymakers and practitioners to reflect on potential negative effects of current policy practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages3
    JournalAmerican Psychologist
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Keywords

    • Academic achievement
    • Education
    • Gifted children
    • Motivation in education
    • Psychological aspects
    • Self-perception

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this