Abstract
This is the first detailed study of the Chinese oppression remedy under the PRC Company Law (Article 20.1-2). Compared to UK, Canadian and Australian equivalents, the wording of the Chinese remedy is vague, and the Supreme People‟s Court has not clarified its meaning. Yet Chinese courts have created a body of de facto case precedents and made the remedy into an effective tool for minority shareholders to gain redress for a broad range of wrongs committed by abusive shareholders. Such use of case precedents should be formalized in China to bring more predictability to statutory interpretation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 559-600 |
Number of pages | 42 |
Journal | American Journal of Comparative Law |
Volume | 63 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- China
- company law
- oppression
- shareholders