Abstract
Section 116 of the Australian Constitution sets out four important guarantees of religious freedom. The fourth clause of that section provides that 'no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth'. During the Convention Debates, the religious tests clause was described as being the least necessary clause of s 116 on the basis, first, that there were no remaining religious tests in the Australian colonies and, second, that it was outlandish to think that the Commonwealth would ever impose one. This article seeks to explore the meaning of the religious tests clause and refute those two suggestions. It seeks to show that at the time of Federation religious tests remained in the Australian colonies. It also seeks to show that the Commonwealth today, albeit unconstitutionally, requires the satisfaction of religious tests for certain public positions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 323-352 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Melbourne University Law Review |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The constitutional prohibition on religious tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver