The convicted felon's right to judicial review and the common law doctrine of attainder in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The decision of Patsalis v State of New South Wales (2012) 266 FLR 207 represents a fundamental development in the common law of Australia. The extent to which the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) (FCPA) applied to applications for judicial review brought by prisoners convicted of a serious indictable offence or a felony remained unclear before the decision of Patsalis. This article examines some of the important implications that flow from the decision of Patsalis, such as the fact that "civil proceedings" in the statutory context of the FCPA was held not to apply to applications for judicial review of administrative decisions brought by a prisoner convicted of a serious indictable offence or a felony who sought to challenge his or her incarceration. The article also examines the common law principle of attainder in light of the statutory enactment of the FCPA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-38
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Civil Litigation and Practice
Volume2
Issue number32
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • common law
  • attainder
  • Australia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The convicted felon's right to judicial review and the common law doctrine of attainder in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this