The cost-effectiveness of a co-managed care model for elderly hip fracture patients in China: a modelling study

Lizheng Xu, Minghui Yang, Xinyi Zhang, Jing Zhang, Jiusheng He, Liangyuan Wen, Xianhai Wang, Zongxin Shi, Sanbao Hu, Fengpo Sun, Zishun Gong, Mingyao Sun, Ke Peng, Pengpeng Ye, Ruofei Ma, Xinbao Wu, Mingsheng Chen, Stephen Jan, Rebecca Ivers, Maoyi TianLei Si

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The clinical effectiveness of multidisciplinary co-managed care for hip fracture patients in China has been demonstrated in a multicenter non-randomized controlled study. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care.Methods: The study is based on a multicenter clinical trial (n = 2071) in China. We developed a state transition microsimulation model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care compared with usual care for hip fracture patients from healthcare system perspective. The costs incorporated into the model included hospitalization costs, post-discharge expenses, and secondary fracture therapy costs. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and effects were discounted at 5% annually. A simulation cycle length of 1-year and a lifetime horizon were employed. The cost-effectiveness threshold was established at USD 37,118. To address uncertainties, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.Findings: In the base case analysis, the co-managed care group had a lifetime cost of USD 31,571 and achieved an effectiveness of 3.22 QALYs, whereas the usual care group incurred a cost of USD 27,878 and gained 2.85 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was USD 9981 per QALY gained; thus the co-managed care model was cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness was sensitive to the age of having hip fractures and hospitalization costs in the intervention group.Interpretation: The co-managed care in hip fracture patients represents value for money, and should be scaled up and prioritized for funding in China. Funding: The study is supported by Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2022-1-2071, 2018-1-2071).
Original languageEnglish
Article number101149
Number of pages13
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Volume49
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • China
  • Co-managed care
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Elderly population
  • Hip fracture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The cost-effectiveness of a co-managed care model for elderly hip fracture patients in China: a modelling study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this