Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The cost-effectiveness of a co-managed care model for elderly hip fracture patients in China: a modelling study

  • Lizheng Xu
  • , Minghui Yang
  • , Xinyi Zhang
  • , Jing Zhang
  • , Jiusheng He
  • , Liangyuan Wen
  • , Xianhai Wang
  • , Zongxin Shi
  • , Sanbao Hu
  • , Fengpo Sun
  • , Zishun Gong
  • , Mingyao Sun
  • , Ke Peng
  • , Pengpeng Ye
  • , Ruofei Ma
  • , Xinbao Wu
  • , Mingsheng Chen
  • , Stephen Jan
  • , Rebecca Ivers
  • , Maoyi Tian
  • Lei Si
  • University of New South Wales
  • Capital Medical University
  • National Center of Orthopaedics
  • Peking University
  • Harbin Medical University
  • Beijing Shunyi District Hospital
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Beijing Changping District Hospital
  • Beijing Liangxiang Hospital
  • Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Nanjing Medical University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The clinical effectiveness of multidisciplinary co-managed care for hip fracture patients in China has been demonstrated in a multicenter non-randomized controlled study. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care.Methods: The study is based on a multicenter clinical trial (n = 2071) in China. We developed a state transition microsimulation model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care compared with usual care for hip fracture patients from healthcare system perspective. The costs incorporated into the model included hospitalization costs, post-discharge expenses, and secondary fracture therapy costs. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and effects were discounted at 5% annually. A simulation cycle length of 1-year and a lifetime horizon were employed. The cost-effectiveness threshold was established at USD 37,118. To address uncertainties, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.Findings: In the base case analysis, the co-managed care group had a lifetime cost of USD 31,571 and achieved an effectiveness of 3.22 QALYs, whereas the usual care group incurred a cost of USD 27,878 and gained 2.85 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was USD 9981 per QALY gained; thus the co-managed care model was cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness was sensitive to the age of having hip fractures and hospitalization costs in the intervention group.Interpretation: The co-managed care in hip fracture patients represents value for money, and should be scaled up and prioritized for funding in China. Funding: The study is supported by Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2022-1-2071, 2018-1-2071).
Original languageEnglish
Article number101149
Number of pages13
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Volume49
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • China
  • Co-managed care
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Elderly population
  • Hip fracture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The cost-effectiveness of a co-managed care model for elderly hip fracture patients in China: a modelling study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this