Abstract
This article examines the critical role of providing written reasons in administrative decision-making, focusing on how transparency, accountability, and fairness are upheld through this practice. It explores the implications of delayed written reasons, particularly in high-stakes cases such as migration and visa cancellations, where timely decisions are essential for justice.Through an analysis of key cases, including Plaintiff M1/2021 and Verrill, the article underscores the necessity of thorough reasoning in both urgent and routine matters. It argues that while timeliness is vital, it must be balanced with intellectual rigour and detailed reasoning to avoid perceptions of injustice, safeguard public confidence, and ensure procedural fairness. The piece concludes by highlighting the need for administrative bodies to be supported with adequate resources to deliver well-reasoned decisions that are both timely and legally sound.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 30 |
Pages (from-to) | 127-142 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | James Cook University Law Review |
Volume | 30 |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |