The cultural realities of clinical supervision in an acute inpatient mental health setting

Michelle Cleary, Adele Freeman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper, the cultural realities of clinical supervision (CS) in acute inpatient mental health settings are explored using an ethnographic approach. Findings suggest that there is a verbal acceptance of CS by mental health nurses but a cultural belief that it has limited experiential value and, thus, a cautious attitude towards its adoption is in practice. This may, in part, be attributable to many nurses believing that they are already undertaking CS, although the informal supervision described does not fit with established definitions of formal supervision. The language used by nurses demonstrates an understanding and appreciation of the benefits of clinical supervision. However, the belief that existing structures inherent to nursing practice already convey these benefits may contribute to the culture of passive resistance to clinical supervision revealed by the findings. This study contributes to current discussions regarding the purpose of CS, the realities of its implementation, and its role relative to existing professional support opportunities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)489-505
    Number of pages17
    JournalIssues in Mental Health Nursing
    Volume26
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Keywords

    • culture conflict
    • mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The cultural realities of clinical supervision in an acute inpatient mental health setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this