The density debate in urban research : an alternative approach to representing urban structure and form

Michael Grosvenor, Phillip O'Neill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Global aspirations for urban sustainability coincide with debate over urban form. Much of the debate centres on the merit of increasing residential densities across metropolitan areas. We argue that this focus on density is problematic. Specifically, we question whether urban density is a sufficient proxy for representing urban structure and form across large metropolitan areas, as was promulgated famously by Newman and Kenworthy some time ago. Our concern is that density tells us little about a neighbourhood’s location, accessibility and design characters. Moreover, the focus on density may well be contributing to poorly located and designed development across metropolitan areas. Here we offer an alternative approach using a typology of urban structure and form to explore urban sustainability potential, specifically through three variables: transport mode choice, energy consumption, and water consumption. Our results are significant and suggest new approaches to urban form and structure in urban planning frameworks.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)442-458
    Number of pages17
    JournalGeographical Research
    Volume52
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • city planning
    • sustainability
    • urban density

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The density debate in urban research : an alternative approach to representing urban structure and form'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this