The development of English as a second language

Bruno Di Biase, Satomi Kawaguchi, Yumiko Yamaguchi

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

    Abstract

    We will not review here the variously detailed descriptions of L2 English already offered by these and other authors. We will, instead, ground the theoretical changes proposed in chapter 1, this volume, by tracing the morphological and syntactic development of this configurational language using a detailed, longitudinal, case study. For the development of mophology, we will note three areas where our treatment of L2 English differs most from previous PT ones. First, we re-examine the categorial stage with reference to four structures, that is, –ing as a verbal marker, past –ed, plural –s, and possessive ‘s, a previously neglected area. We discuss possessive ‘s in some detail together with possessive determiners and pronouns, but we exclude both the latter from the PT schedule for English. Second, we place the unification of AUXs (be, have and modals) with lexical V within the VP in the phrasal stage, unlike Pienemann who since 1998 deals with English VP only in the context of questions. Third, we adopt for English the concept of ‘soft barriers’ (cf. ch. 1, § 5) within stage boundaries to deal with intrastage sequences, such as the very late acquisition of –ed within the category stage.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGrammatical Development in Second Languages : Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory
    EditorsCamilla Bettoni, Bruno Di Biase
    Place of PublicationItaly
    PublisherEuropean Second Language Association
    Pages85-115
    Number of pages31
    ISBN (Print)9781329427655
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • language and languages
    • study and teaching
    • second language acquisition
    • English language
    • syntax
    • morphology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The development of English as a second language'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this