The 'difficult heritage' of the Native Mounted Police

Tim Rowse, Emma Waterton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article intervenes in the debate about whether and how the 'Frontier Wars' should be represented in Australia's military heritage. If they were to be represented, those who resisted British colonial occupation would figure as Aboriginal patriots in a renovated heritage of Australian service to country. We point out, however, that certain historical actors have been, so far (and perhaps forever), excluded from such a revised Indigenous military heritage: those Aboriginal peoples who 'served' in the Native Mounted Police. While the archival record is patchy, scholarship tells us that, in their pacification of frontiers, the Native Mounted Police killed many Aboriginal peoples. Interrogating the meaning of war heritage in Australia, we discuss the politics of forgetting against the obligations of historiography to collective memory and ask: must scholarship always interrogate identity-sustaining myth, in service to the truth? To explore this question, we adopt Sharon Macdonald's concept of 'difficult heritage'.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)737-751
Number of pages15
JournalMemory Studies
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Australia. Native Mounted Police
  • collective memory
  • historiography
  • military history

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 'difficult heritage' of the Native Mounted Police'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this