The EdTech stack: A speculative design thought experiment

Teresa Swist

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    The large-scale digitalisation of education has escalated not only globally distributed edtech products, services and automated decision-making systems but also uncertainty about how to address accompanying social, ecological and technological controversies. A key question this raises is: How can stakeholders with diverse expertise reconfigure knowledge about education in an age of planetary-scale computation? In particular, emerging public spaces and controversies offer a valuable opportunity to democratise expertise between various groups to inform measured action. To explore these planetary-scale controversies and spaces, a speculative design thought experiment was conducted. The 'EdTech Stack' introduced is a geo-design brief which articulates a set of systemic capabilities and aligned controversies. This conceptual and methodological innovation seeks to democratise expertise across multiple scales, so as to reconfigure digital education governance in more just, sustainable and equitable ways. I hope it inspires diverse stakeholders to identify the limits and possibilities of the EdTech Stack we Have, through interplaying with the EdTech Stack to Come.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWorld Yearbook of Education 2024
    Subtitle of host publicationDigitalisation of Education in the Era of Algorithms, Automation and Artificial Intelligence
    PublisherTaylor & Francis
    Pages276-293
    Number of pages18
    ISBN (Electronic)9781003359722
    ISBN (Print)9781032417905
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2023

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Ben Williamson, Janja Komljenovic and Kalervo N. Gulson. All rights reserved.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The EdTech stack: A speculative design thought experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this