Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of expression clarity and presentation modality on non-native vocal emotion perception

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference Paper › Conference Paper › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study investigated how the presentation of visual information and the clarity of expressions would influence this non-native effect. Australian English and Cantonese native listeners were presented spoken Australian English sentences produced by actors who had very clear or ambiguous emotional expressions (levels of clarity were established in another study). Angry, happy, sad, surprise or disgust expressions were tested in auditory only (AO), visual only (VO) and audio-visual (A V) conditions. The results showed the expected non-native disadvantage for AO presentation; with the Cantonese speaker's performance significantly less accurate than the English ones. There was also the expected difference as a function of the clarity of the emotion expression; this effect was the same magnitude across the language groups. This was not the case in the VO or A V conditions where performance levels did not differ. This indicates that visual cues helped the Cantonese listeners compensate for poorer AO recognition.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 17th Oriental COCOSDA Conference, 10-12 September 2014, Phuket, Thailand
PublisherIEEE
Number of pages5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventInternational Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques. Oriental Chapter Conference -
Duration: 10 Sept 2014 → …

Conference

ConferenceInternational Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques. Oriental Chapter Conference
Period10/09/14 → …

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of expression clarity and presentation modality on non-native vocal emotion perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this