TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of speech-language pathology students on clinician time use and activity
AU - Bourne, E.
AU - McAllister, L.
AU - Nagarajan, S.
AU - Short, K.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Purpose: This prospective study investigated the impact of supervising students on public health speech-language pathologists’ (SLPs) time and patient activity levels in order to broaden evidence in the profession. Method: Thirty-four SLPs supervising students collected data profiling their time use and activity during the first, middle and penultimate placement week. They also collected data for a week when not supervising students. Pre- and post-placement surveys were used to supplement quantitative data with additional information such as clinician and student experience levels. Result: Overall clinical time (face-to-face and indirect) and the number of patients seen neither increased nor decreased during student placements. However, clinicians’ use of time altered across placement periods. For example, SLP time delivering clinical services decreased but time observing students providing clinical services increased as the placement progressed. Some differences in time spent in non-clinical activities (e.g. student teaching and SLP administration) were found. Comparing data from placements with varying supervision models or student competence level showed few significant differences in time use, activity or productivity. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in overall clinical time used, nor patient activity or productivity whether clinicians were supervising students or not. Further research is required within SLP services.
AB - Purpose: This prospective study investigated the impact of supervising students on public health speech-language pathologists’ (SLPs) time and patient activity levels in order to broaden evidence in the profession. Method: Thirty-four SLPs supervising students collected data profiling their time use and activity during the first, middle and penultimate placement week. They also collected data for a week when not supervising students. Pre- and post-placement surveys were used to supplement quantitative data with additional information such as clinician and student experience levels. Result: Overall clinical time (face-to-face and indirect) and the number of patients seen neither increased nor decreased during student placements. However, clinicians’ use of time altered across placement periods. For example, SLP time delivering clinical services decreased but time observing students providing clinical services increased as the placement progressed. Some differences in time spent in non-clinical activities (e.g. student teaching and SLP administration) were found. Comparing data from placements with varying supervision models or student competence level showed few significant differences in time use, activity or productivity. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in overall clinical time used, nor patient activity or productivity whether clinicians were supervising students or not. Further research is required within SLP services.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:66494
U2 - 10.1080/17549507.2017.1416175
DO - 10.1080/17549507.2017.1416175
M3 - Article
SN - 1754-9507
VL - 21
SP - 163
EP - 174
JO - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
JF - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
IS - 2
ER -