TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of midfoot strike gait retraining on impact loading and joint stiffness
AU - Chan, Zoe Y. S.
AU - Zhang, Janet H.
AU - Ferber, Reed
AU - Shum, Gary
AU - Cheung, Roy T. H.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objective: To assess the biomechanical changes following a systematic gait retraining to modify footstrike patterns from rearfoot strike (RFS) to midfoot strike (MFS). Design: Pre-post interventional study. All participants underwent a gait retraining program designed to modify footstrike pattern to MFS. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Twenty habitual RFS male runners participated. Main outcome measures: Gait evaluations were conducted before and after the training. Footstrike pattern, vertical loading rates, ankle and knee joint stiffness were compared. Results: Participants’ footstrike angle was reduced (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.65) and knee joint stiffness was increased (p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.69). No significant difference was found in the vertical loading rates (p > 0.155). Further subgroup analyses were conducted on the respondents (n = 8, 40% of participants) who exhibited MFS for over 80% of their footfalls during the post-training evaluation. Apart from the increased knee joint stiffness (p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = 1.14), respondents exhibited a significant reduction in the ankle joint stiffness (p = 0.019, Cohen’s d = 1.17) when running with MFS. Conclusions: Gait retraining to promote MFS was effective in reducing runners’ footstrike angle, but only 40% of participants responded to this training program. The inconsistent training effect on impact loading suggests a need to develop new training protocols in an effort to prevent running injuries.
AB - Objective: To assess the biomechanical changes following a systematic gait retraining to modify footstrike patterns from rearfoot strike (RFS) to midfoot strike (MFS). Design: Pre-post interventional study. All participants underwent a gait retraining program designed to modify footstrike pattern to MFS. Setting: Research laboratory. Participants: Twenty habitual RFS male runners participated. Main outcome measures: Gait evaluations were conducted before and after the training. Footstrike pattern, vertical loading rates, ankle and knee joint stiffness were compared. Results: Participants’ footstrike angle was reduced (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.65) and knee joint stiffness was increased (p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.69). No significant difference was found in the vertical loading rates (p > 0.155). Further subgroup analyses were conducted on the respondents (n = 8, 40% of participants) who exhibited MFS for over 80% of their footfalls during the post-training evaluation. Apart from the increased knee joint stiffness (p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = 1.14), respondents exhibited a significant reduction in the ankle joint stiffness (p = 0.019, Cohen’s d = 1.17) when running with MFS. Conclusions: Gait retraining to promote MFS was effective in reducing runners’ footstrike angle, but only 40% of participants responded to this training program. The inconsistent training effect on impact loading suggests a need to develop new training protocols in an effort to prevent running injuries.
KW - gait
KW - joints
KW - running
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:55400
U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.011
DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.011
M3 - Article
SN - 1873-1600
SN - 1466-853X
VL - 42
SP - 139
EP - 145
JO - Physical Therapy in Sport
JF - Physical Therapy in Sport
ER -