The evolution of franchising in the Chinese courts : the qualifications for a franchisor and the application of the disclosure requirements

Zhiqiong June Wang, Paul Jones

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    Franchising, a business concept developed in the US in 1950s has captured the opportunity to develop in China since 1990s. With the Interim Franchise Measures issued in 1997, China was one of the first few countries with a franchise specific regulation. However, it was not until the coming into force of the Commercial Franchise Administration Regulation in 2007, the volume of franchise cases has steadily risen. This paper examines the evolution in the way the Chinese courts have handled franchise disputes. It firstly compares the provisions of the 2005 Measures and the 2007 Regulation. It also briefly discussed how the Chinese law is similar to or different from the franchising specific laws in other countries. It analyses the decision of the selected cases in the Beijing courts and discuss the change of interpretation of law by the courts, from having the courts make an administrative decision as to whether a corporation meets the qualifications to be a franchisor, the courts now make a decision as to whether the contract was properly and fairly formed by the making of the required disclosures.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the Third Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference, 25-26 February 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    PublisherWorld Business Institute Australia
    Number of pages16
    ISBN (Print)9781922069191
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    EventAsia-Pacific Business Research Conference -
    Duration: 25 Mar 2013 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceAsia-Pacific Business Research Conference
    Period25/03/13 → …

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of franchising in the Chinese courts : the qualifications for a franchisor and the application of the disclosure requirements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this