TY - JOUR
T1 - The functional network signature of heterogeneity in freezing of gait
AU - Ehgoetz Martens, Kaylena A.
AU - Hall, Julie M.
AU - Georgiades, Matthew J.
AU - Gilat, Moran
AU - Walton, Courtney C.
AU - Matar, Elie
AU - Lewis, Simon J. G.
AU - Shine, James M.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Freezing of gait is a complex, heterogeneous, and highly variable phenomenon whose pathophysiology and neural signature remains enigmatic. Evidence suggests that freezing is associated with impairments across cognitive, motor and affective domains; however, most research to date has focused on investigating one axis of freezing of gait in isolation. This has led to inconsistent findings and a range of different pathophysiological models of freezing of gait, due in large part to the tendency for studies to investigate freezing of gait as a homogeneous entity. To investigate the neural mechanisms of this heterogeneity, we used an established virtual reality paradigm to elicit freezing behaviour in 41 Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait and examined individual differences in the component processes (i.e. cognitive, motor and affective function) that underlie freezing of gait in conjunction with task-based functional MRI. First, we combined three unique components of the freezing phenotype: impaired set-shifting ability, step time variability, and self-reported anxiety and depression in a principal components analysis to estimate the severity of freezing behaviour with a multivariate approach. By combining these measures, we were then able to interrogate the pattern of task-based functional connectivity associated with freezing (compared to normal foot tapping) in a subcohort of 20 participants who experienced sufficient amounts of freezing during task functional MRI. Specifically, we used the first principal component from our behavioural analysis to classify patterns of functional connectivity into those that were associated with: (i) increased severity; (ii) increased compensation; or (iii) those that were independent of freezing severity. Coupling between the cognitive and limbic networks was associated with 'worse freezing severity', whereas anti-coupling between the putamen and the cognitive and limbic networks was related to 'increased compensation'. Additionally, anti-coupling between cognitive cortical regions and the caudate nucleus were 'independent of freezing severity' and thus may represent common neural underpinnings of freezing that are unaffected by heterogenous factors. Finally, we related these connectivity patterns to each of the individual components (cognitive, motor, affective) in turn, thus exposing latent heterogeneity in the freezing phenotype, while also identifying critical functional network signatures that may represent potential targets for novel therapeutic intervention. In conclusion, our findings provide confirmatory evidence for systems-level impairments in the pathophysiology of freezing of gait and further advance our understanding of the whole-brain deficits that mediate symptom expression in Parkinson's disease.
AB - Freezing of gait is a complex, heterogeneous, and highly variable phenomenon whose pathophysiology and neural signature remains enigmatic. Evidence suggests that freezing is associated with impairments across cognitive, motor and affective domains; however, most research to date has focused on investigating one axis of freezing of gait in isolation. This has led to inconsistent findings and a range of different pathophysiological models of freezing of gait, due in large part to the tendency for studies to investigate freezing of gait as a homogeneous entity. To investigate the neural mechanisms of this heterogeneity, we used an established virtual reality paradigm to elicit freezing behaviour in 41 Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait and examined individual differences in the component processes (i.e. cognitive, motor and affective function) that underlie freezing of gait in conjunction with task-based functional MRI. First, we combined three unique components of the freezing phenotype: impaired set-shifting ability, step time variability, and self-reported anxiety and depression in a principal components analysis to estimate the severity of freezing behaviour with a multivariate approach. By combining these measures, we were then able to interrogate the pattern of task-based functional connectivity associated with freezing (compared to normal foot tapping) in a subcohort of 20 participants who experienced sufficient amounts of freezing during task functional MRI. Specifically, we used the first principal component from our behavioural analysis to classify patterns of functional connectivity into those that were associated with: (i) increased severity; (ii) increased compensation; or (iii) those that were independent of freezing severity. Coupling between the cognitive and limbic networks was associated with 'worse freezing severity', whereas anti-coupling between the putamen and the cognitive and limbic networks was related to 'increased compensation'. Additionally, anti-coupling between cognitive cortical regions and the caudate nucleus were 'independent of freezing severity' and thus may represent common neural underpinnings of freezing that are unaffected by heterogenous factors. Finally, we related these connectivity patterns to each of the individual components (cognitive, motor, affective) in turn, thus exposing latent heterogeneity in the freezing phenotype, while also identifying critical functional network signatures that may represent potential targets for novel therapeutic intervention. In conclusion, our findings provide confirmatory evidence for systems-level impairments in the pathophysiology of freezing of gait and further advance our understanding of the whole-brain deficits that mediate symptom expression in Parkinson's disease.
KW - Parkinson's disease
KW - foot
KW - gait
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - virtual reality
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:46681
U2 - 10.1093/brain/awy019
DO - 10.1093/brain/awy019
M3 - Article
SN - 0006-8950
VL - 141
SP - 1145
EP - 1160
JO - Brain
JF - Brain
IS - 4
ER -