Abstract
The proposition that the crisis was inherently unpredictable is a recurrent theme amongst those charged with preventing such events. It is also a convenient untruth. A Netherlands academic did a survey of the literature, to identify 12 economists and market analysts who did foresee this crisis - of whom I was one. More importantly, he identified common elements to the analyses that led these researchers to foresee what neoclassical economists in particular failed to anticipate. Bezemer noted that though we came from varied intellectual backgrounds, we shared four common factors. My own analysis extends Hyman Minsky's 'financial instability hypothesis', using a theory of monetary dynamics known as Circuit Theory, which originated in Europe. Both perspectives played a key role in helping identify that a crisis was imminent. Minsky emphasised the importance of the debt to GDP ratio as the key indicator of financial fragility; while the Circuit School's insights enabled the development of a purely monetary model of the economy in which changes in debt play a crucial role in determining the level of aggregate demand.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Australian Political Economy |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Open Access - Access Right Statement
© 2009 Australian Political Economy MovementKeywords
- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009
- debts, public
- economic history
- gross domestic product
- production (economic theory)
- unemployment