Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The global implications of the early surviving rock art of greater Southeast Asia

  • Paul S.C. Taçon
  • , Noel H. Tan
  • , Sue O'Connor
  • , Ji Xueping
  • , Li Gang
  • , Darren Curnoe
  • , David Bulbeck
  • , Budianto Hakim
  • , Iwan Sumantri
  • , Heng Than
  • , Im Sokrithy
  • , Stephen Chia
  • , Khuon Khun-Neay
  • , Soeung Kong
  • Griffith University Queensland
  • Australian National University
  • Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology
  • Yunnan University
  • Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture Cultural Relics Administration Office
  • University of New South Wales
  • Balai Arkeologi Makassar
  • Universitas Hasanuddin
  • APSARA Authority
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rock art of Southeast Asia has been less thoroughly studied than that of Europe or Australia, and it has generally been considered to be more recent in origin. New dating evidence from Mainland and Island Southeast Asia, however, demonstrates that the earliest motifs (hand stencils and naturalistic animals) are of late Pleistocene age and as early as those of Europe. The similar form of the earliest painted motifs in Europe, Africa and Southeast Asia suggests that they are the product of a shared underlying behaviour, but the difference in context (rockshelters) indicates that experiences in deep caves cannot have been their inspiration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1050-1064
Number of pages15
JournalAntiquity
Volume88
Issue number342
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Animal motifs
  • Hand stencils
  • Painted caves
  • Rock art
  • Rockshelters
  • Uranium-series dating

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The global implications of the early surviving rock art of greater Southeast Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this