Abstract
The Epicurean theory of social formation has been preserved in Hermarchus’s account, a major figure of the early period of the School. The “Hermarchus-Spinoza complex” refers to the Epicurean articulation of a politics that is inherently incompatible with the contrast between naturalism and constructivism. The Epicurean approach manages to overcome this binary because of its conception of phronesis as performative. The Hermarchus-Spinoza complex both provides a historical depth to the undoing of the naturalism vs constructivism binary and describes performativity in instrumental terms, which challenges ingrained assumptions arising from the critique of instrumental reason.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 292-315 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Political Theory |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2026 |
Keywords
- constructivism
- critique of instrumental reason
- Epicureanism
- naturalism
- queer politics
- Spinoza
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Hermarchus–Spinoza complex: epicurean politics and the “Naturalism vs. Constructivism” opposition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver