Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Hermarchus–Spinoza complex: epicurean politics and the “Naturalism vs. Constructivism” opposition

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Epicurean theory of social formation has been preserved in Hermarchus’s account, a major figure of the early period of the School. The “Hermarchus-Spinoza complex” refers to the Epicurean articulation of a politics that is inherently incompatible with the contrast between naturalism and constructivism. The Epicurean approach manages to overcome this binary because of its conception of phronesis as performative. The Hermarchus-Spinoza complex both provides a historical depth to the undoing of the naturalism vs constructivism binary and describes performativity in instrumental terms, which challenges ingrained assumptions arising from the critique of instrumental reason.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-315
Number of pages24
JournalPolitical Theory
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Keywords

  • constructivism
  • critique of instrumental reason
  • Epicureanism
  • naturalism
  • queer politics
  • Spinoza

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Hermarchus–Spinoza complex: epicurean politics and the “Naturalism vs. Constructivism” opposition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this