The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

Amanda J. Barnier; Celia B. Harris; John Sutton

doi:10.1017/S0140525X15001260

The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

Amanda J. Barnier
, Celia B. Harris
, John Sutton

Macquarie University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e138
Journal	The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	39
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001260
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2016
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X15001260

Cite this

@article{9e355f36cbe64756a25ed5605c6dadb7,

title = "The hows and whys of {"}we{"} (and {"}I{"}) in groups",

abstract = "Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.",

author = "Barnier, \{Amanda J.\} and Harris, \{Celia B.\} and John Sutton",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X15001260",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "e138",

journal = "The Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "1469-1825",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

AU - Barnier, Amanda J.

AU - Harris, Celia B.

AU - Sutton, John

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.

AB - Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85040369345

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X15001260

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X15001260

M3 - Article

C2 - 28355775

AN - SCOPUS:85040369345

SN - 1469-1825

VL - 39

SP - e138

JO - The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

ER -

The hows and whys of "we" (and "I") in groups

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this