The impact of alternative assets on the role of direct property in Australian mixed-asset portfolios

Graeme Newell, Chyi Lin Lee

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australian superannuation funds have increased their allocations to the alternative assets in recent years; this includes private equity, infrastructure, hedge funds and commodities. This raises the issue of whether this increased allocation to these alternative assets impacts on the strategic role and allocation of direct property in the Australian mixed-asset portfolio, due to the potential increased competition between these assets. This paper assesses the risk-adjusted performance and portfolio diversification benefits of direct property and various alternative assets over 1995-2009 and their role in optimal mixed-asset portfolios. While direct property is still seen to play a key role in the portfolio, direct property plays a less significant role in the portfolio when the alternative assets are included. In particular, Australian unlisted infrastructure and listed infrastructure are seen as key alternative assets across a significant portion of the portfolio risk spectrum. This is seen as validating the investment strategy of Australian superannuation funds who have significant exposure to the infrastructure sector.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)531-539
    Number of pages9
    JournalPacific Rim Property Research Journal
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • portfolio diversification
    • superannuation funds
    • alternative assets
    • direct property
    • Australia

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of alternative assets on the role of direct property in Australian mixed-asset portfolios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this