The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics

Xueyuan Gao; Peter B. Reich; Jeffrey R. Vincent; Matthew E. Fagan; Robin L. Chazdon; Steffen Fritz; Dmitry Schepaschenko; Matthew D. Potts; Matthew C. Hansen; Martin Jung; Pedro H.S. Brancalion; María Uriarte; Trevor F. Keenan; Thomas W. Crowther; Ralph O. Dubayah; Myroslava Lesiv; Shunlin Liang; Dongdong Wang

doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1

The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics

Xueyuan Gao
, Peter B. Reich
, Jeffrey R. Vincent
, Matthew E. Fagan
, Robin L. Chazdon
, Steffen Fritz
, Dmitry Schepaschenko
, Matthew D. Potts
, Matthew C. Hansen
, Martin Jung
, Pedro H.S. Brancalion
, María Uriarte
, Trevor F. Keenan
, Thomas W. Crowther
, Ralph O. Dubayah
, Myroslava Lesiv
, Shunlin Liang
, Dongdong Wang

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment

Princeton University
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Duke University
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
University of the Sunshine Coast
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg
University of California at Berkeley
Carbon Direct
Universidade de São Paulo
re.green
Columbia University
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Earthshot Labs
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
The University of Hong Kong
Peking University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Naturally regenerated forests and managed tree systems provide different levels of carbon, biodiversity, and livelihood benefits. Here, we show that tree cover gains in the moist tropics during 1982–2015 were 56% ± 3% naturally regenerated forests and 27% ± 2.6% managed tree systems, with these differences in forest type, not only natural conditions (climate, soil, and topography), driving observed carbon recovery rates. The remaining 17% ± 3% likely represents small, unmanaged tree patches within non-forest cover types. Achieving global forest restoration goals requires robust monitoring, reporting, and verification of forest types established by restoration initiatives.

Original language	English
Article number	6092
Number of pages	6
Journal	Nature Communications
Volume	16
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1
Publication status	Published - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 15 Life on Land

Access to Document

10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Full textFinal published version, 1.17 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

Gao, X., Reich, P. B., Vincent, J. R., Fagan, M. E., Chazdon, R. L., Fritz, S., Schepaschenko, D., Potts, M. D., Hansen, M. C., Jung, M., Brancalion, P. H. S., Uriarte, M., Keenan, T. F., Crowther, T. W., Dubayah, R. O., Lesiv, M., Liang, S., & Wang, D. (2025). The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics. Nature Communications, 16(1), Article 6092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1

@article{7d7e24f8a00046e2ad6023d92a0f3a5c,

title = "The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics",

abstract = "Naturally regenerated forests and managed tree systems provide different levels of carbon, biodiversity, and livelihood benefits. Here, we show that tree cover gains in the moist tropics during 1982–2015 were 56\% ± 3\% naturally regenerated forests and 27\% ± 2.6\% managed tree systems, with these differences in forest type, not only natural conditions (climate, soil, and topography), driving observed carbon recovery rates. The remaining 17\% ± 3\% likely represents small, unmanaged tree patches within non-forest cover types. Achieving global forest restoration goals requires robust monitoring, reporting, and verification of forest types established by restoration initiatives.",

author = "Xueyuan Gao and Reich, \{Peter B.\} and Vincent, \{Jeffrey R.\} and Fagan, \{Matthew E.\} and Chazdon, \{Robin L.\} and Steffen Fritz and Dmitry Schepaschenko and Potts, \{Matthew D.\} and Hansen, \{Matthew C.\} and Martin Jung and Brancalion, \{Pedro H.S.\} and Mar{\'i}a Uriarte and Keenan, \{Trevor F.\} and Crowther, \{Thomas W.\} and Dubayah, \{Ralph O.\} and Myroslava Lesiv and Shunlin Liang and Dongdong Wang",

year = "2025",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

journal = "Nature Communications",

issn = "2041-1723",

publisher = "Nature Research",

number = "1",

}

Gao, X, Reich, PB, Vincent, JR, Fagan, ME, Chazdon, RL, Fritz, S, Schepaschenko, D, Potts, MD, Hansen, MC, Jung, M, Brancalion, PHS, Uriarte, M, Keenan, TF, Crowther, TW, Dubayah, RO, Lesiv, M, Liang, S & Wang, D 2025, 'The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics', Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, 6092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics

AU - Gao, Xueyuan

AU - Reich, Peter B.

AU - Vincent, Jeffrey R.

AU - Fagan, Matthew E.

AU - Chazdon, Robin L.

AU - Fritz, Steffen

AU - Schepaschenko, Dmitry

AU - Potts, Matthew D.

AU - Hansen, Matthew C.

AU - Jung, Martin

AU - Brancalion, Pedro H.S.

AU - Uriarte, María

AU - Keenan, Trevor F.

AU - Crowther, Thomas W.

AU - Dubayah, Ralph O.

AU - Lesiv, Myroslava

AU - Liang, Shunlin

AU - Wang, Dongdong

PY - 2025/12

Y1 - 2025/12

N2 - Naturally regenerated forests and managed tree systems provide different levels of carbon, biodiversity, and livelihood benefits. Here, we show that tree cover gains in the moist tropics during 1982–2015 were 56% ± 3% naturally regenerated forests and 27% ± 2.6% managed tree systems, with these differences in forest type, not only natural conditions (climate, soil, and topography), driving observed carbon recovery rates. The remaining 17% ± 3% likely represents small, unmanaged tree patches within non-forest cover types. Achieving global forest restoration goals requires robust monitoring, reporting, and verification of forest types established by restoration initiatives.

AB - Naturally regenerated forests and managed tree systems provide different levels of carbon, biodiversity, and livelihood benefits. Here, we show that tree cover gains in the moist tropics during 1982–2015 were 56% ± 3% naturally regenerated forests and 27% ± 2.6% managed tree systems, with these differences in forest type, not only natural conditions (climate, soil, and topography), driving observed carbon recovery rates. The remaining 17% ± 3% likely represents small, unmanaged tree patches within non-forest cover types. Achieving global forest restoration goals requires robust monitoring, reporting, and verification of forest types established by restoration initiatives.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010052292

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1

DO - 10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 40603883

AN - SCOPUS:105010052292

SN - 2041-1723

VL - 16

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 6092

ER -

The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this