Abstract
Friedrich Hayek's account of "spontaneous order" has generated increasing interest in recent decades. His argument for the superiority of the market in distributing knowledge without the need for central oversight has appealed to progressive democratic theorists, who are wary of the hubris of state planning and attracted to possibilities for self-organization, and to Foucaultians, who have long counseled political theory to cut off the King's head. A spontaneous social order, organized by an invisible hand, would appear to dispense with arbitrary power and foster creativity and individual liberty. This article challenges this view by highlighting the centrality of submission to Hayek's account of spontaneous order. It shows that Hayek struggles to obscure the providentialism underpinning the account of social order he derives from Adam Ferguson and the Scottish Enlightenment. Nonetheless, his own account of spontaneous order relies on faith in the workings of the market, and submission to unintelligible market forces.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 156-184 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Political Theory |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Ferguson_Adam_1723, 1816
- Foucault_Michel_1926, 1984
- Hayek_Friedrich A. von (Friedrich August)_1899, 1992
- self, organizing systems
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The invisible hand of Friedrich Hayek : submission and spontaneous order'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver