The Leinster and Cobbold indices improve inferences about microbial diversity

Stavros D. Veresoglou, Jeff R. Powell, John Davison, Ylva Lekberg, Matthias C. Rillig

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    An increasing number of ecological studies compare the diversity of microbial taxa along environmental gradients or between imposed treatments. Estimates are often based on analysis-of-variance of taxon-richness inferred from pyrosequencing data. We conducted a reanalysis of three 454-pyrosequencing studies on arbuscular-mycorrhizal-fungal diversity to evaluate the suitability of using the Leinster and Cobbold diversity-indices (LCdis) to assess diversity. We expected that the potential of LCdis to consider phylogenic relationships could resolve problems arising from ambiguous species-delineation in microbial-systems. Our reanalysis showed that comparisons between studies differing considerably in sequencing depth may be risky. Moreover, we show that LCdis not only reproduce the results of analyses of variance but can also resolve issues connected to variation in sequence read number, while additionally representing a less conservative metric of diversity than analysis-of-variance of taxa-richness. Based on these results we advocate the use of inclusive diversity indices in ecological studies targeting microbial communities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages7
    JournalFungal Ecology
    Volume11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Leinster and Cobbold indices improve inferences about microbial diversity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this