Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The magnitude of androgen receptor positivity in breast cancer is critical for reliable prediction of disease outcome

  • Carmela Ricciardelli
  • , Tina Bianco-Miotto
  • , Shalini Jindal
  • , Lisa M. Butler
  • , Samuel Leung
  • , Catriona M. McNeil
  • , Sandra A. O'Toole
  • , Esmaeil Ebrahimie
  • , Ewan K. A. Millar
  • , Andrew J. Sakko
  • , Alexandra I. Ruiz
  • , Sarah L. Vowler
  • , David G. Huntsman
  • , Stephen N. Birrell
  • , Robert L. Sutherland
  • , Carlo Palmieri
  • , Theresa E. Hickey
  • , Wayne D. Tilley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Consensus is lacking regarding the androgen receptor (AR) as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The objectives of this study were to comprehensively review the literature on AR prognostication and determine optimal criteria for AR as an independent predictor of breast cancer survival. Experimental Design: AR positivity was assessed by immunostaining in two clinically validated primary breast cancer cohorts [training cohort, n = 219; validation cohort, n = 418; 77% and 79% estrogen receptor alpha (ERa) positive, respectively]. The optimal AR cut-point was determined by ROC analysis in the training cohort and applied to both cohorts. Results: AR was an independent prognostic marker of breast cancer outcome in 22 of 46 (48%) previous studies that performed multivariate analyses. Most studies used cut-points of 1% or 10% nuclear positivity. Herein, neither 1% nor 10% cut-points were robustly prognostic. ROC analysis revealed that a higher AR cut-point (78% positivity) provided optimal sensitivity and specificity to predict breast cancer survival in the training (HR, 0.41; P = 0.015) and validation (HR, 0.50; P = 0.014) cohorts. Tenfold cross-validation confirmed the robustness of this AR cut-point. Patients with ERa-positive tumors and AR positivity 78% had the best survival in both cohorts (P [removed]0.87) had the best outcomes (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This study defines an optimal AR cut-point to reliably predict breast cancer survival. Testing this cut-point in prospective cohorts is warranted for implementation of AR as a prognostic factor in the clinical management of breast cancer.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2328-2341
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The magnitude of androgen receptor positivity in breast cancer is critical for reliable prediction of disease outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this