Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The MIDA Mortality Risk Score: Development and external validation of a prognostic model for early and late death in degenerative mitral regurgitation

  • Francesco Grigioni
  • , Marie Annick Clavel
  • , Jean Louis Vanoverschelde
  • , Christophe Tribouilloy
  • , Rodolfo Pizarro
  • , Marianne Huebner
  • , Jean Francois Avierinos
  • , Andrea Barbieri
  • , Rakesh Suri
  • , Agnds Pasquet
  • , Dan Rusinaru
  • , Gaetano D. Gargiulo
  • , Pablo Oberti
  • , Alexis Thdron
  • , Francesca Bursi
  • , Hector Michelena
  • , Siham Lazam
  • , Catherine Szymanski
  • , Vuyisile T. Nkomo
  • , Martin Schumacher
  • Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
  • EMR
  • Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • CHU Amiens Picardie
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
  • Michigan State University
  • Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi
  • University of Freiburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims In degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), lack of mortality scores predicting death favours misperception of individual patients' risk and inappropriate decision-making. Methods and results The Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) registries include 3666 patients (age 66 ± 14 years; 70% males; follow-up 7.8 ± 5.0 years) with pure, isolated, DMR consecutively diagnosed by echocardiography at tertiary (European/North/South-American) centres. The MIDA Score was derived from the MIDA-Flail-Registry (2472 patients with DMR and flail leaflet-Derivation Cohort) by weighting all guideline-provided prognostic markers, and externally validated in the MIDA-BNP-Registry (1194 patients with DMR and flail leaflet/prolapse-Validation Cohort). The MIDA Score ranged from 0 to 12 depending on accumulating risk factors. In predicting total mortality post-diagnosis, the MIDA Score showed excellent concordance both in Derivation Cohort (c = 0.78) and Validation Cohort (c = 0.81). In the whole MIDA population (n = 3666 patients), 1-year mortality with Scores 0, 7-8, and 11-12 was 0.4, 17, and 48% under medical management and 1, 7, and 14% after surgery, respectively (P < 0.001). Five-year survival with Scores 0, 7-8, and 11-12 was 98 ± 1, 57 ± 4, and 21 ± 10% under medical management and 99 ± 1, 82 ± 2, and 57 ± 9% after surgery (P < 0.001). In models including all guideline-provided prognostic markers and the EuroScoreII, the MIDA Score provided incremental prognostic information (P < 0.002). Conclusion The MIDA Score may represent an innovative tool for DMR management, being able to position a given patient within a continuous spectrum of short- and long-term mortality risk, either under medical or surgical management. This innovative prognostic indicator may provide a specific framework for future clinical trials aiming to compare new technologies for DMR treatment in homogeneous risk categories of patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1281-1291
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume39
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2017.

Keywords

  • Mitral regurgitation
  • Mitral repair
  • Percutaneous mitral repair
  • Percutaneous mitral replacement
  • Prognosis
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The MIDA Mortality Risk Score: Development and external validation of a prognostic model for early and late death in degenerative mitral regurgitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this