The need for accuracy and validity in research on nightlife and drinking : a commentary on Devilly et al. and recommendations for future research

Peter G. Miller, Tanya Chikritzhs, Nicolas Droste, Amy Pennay, Stephen Tomsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on nightlife and drinking faces many unique challenges, and validity in research is an important concern. A recent publication by Devilly et al. entitled “SmartStart: Results of a large point of entry study into preloading alcohol and associated behaviours” contains definitions and assumptions about prior work that require more careful consideration. Important issues include: using a definition of pre-drinking which is the same as previous work so that valid comparison can be made, reporting of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels that comply with other work, accurate reporting of response rates, and careful consideration of sampling approaches to maximise ethical integrity. Ensuring consistency of definition and accurate representation of previous literature regarding BAC, pre-drinking and energy drink use, is important for supplying the broader community with reliable information on which policy decisions can be made.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-40
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume50
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • alcohol
  • bars (drinking establishments)
  • blood alcohol
  • drinking of alcoholic beverages
  • nightlife

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The need for accuracy and validity in research on nightlife and drinking : a commentary on Devilly et al. and recommendations for future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this