The ontological politics of 'closing the gaps'

In Australia and New Zealand, the realization of the knowledge object ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“national populationââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ makes it necessary to involve Indigenous Australians and MÃ"žÃ‚Âori in the Census. Both Indigenous peoples have engaged in the Census and have made use of the resulting official statistics in their self-representation as peoples not yet accorded social justice. This paper considers two of the issues of representing Indigenous peoples as populations: where to draw the distinction that makes the non-Indigenous/Indigenous population binary; and how to prevent the quantitative representation (ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“populationââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢) from subverting the qualitative representation (ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“peopleââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢). That ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“populationââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ might trump ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“peopleââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ is arguably an effect of the nation-state being a kind of ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“method assemblageââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ in which people are arrayed as social entities that are knowable in certain terms. Drawing on the terms of recent liberal political theory, the paper poses the question of the ââ"šÂ¬Ã‹Å“civicityââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ of Indigenous Australians and MÃ"žÃ‚Âori, concluding that there are ways that Indigenous intellectuals might use population data to substantiate their claims to people-hood.