The practicalities of using assessment management to develop evaluative judgement

Cath Ellis

doi:10.4324/9781315109251

The practicalities of using assessment management to develop evaluative judgement

Cath Ellis

University of New South Wales

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference Paper › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

However worthy the theoretical principles of evaluative judgment are, they are worthless unless they are also practicable. This is particularly challenging in a higher education sector that is increasingly dominated by modularisation and massification. This chapter considers some of the questions we need to address in order to develop efficient and effective technical solutions that support the development of students' evaluative judgement at scale and across even the most complex degree programmes.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education
Subtitle of host publication	Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work
Publisher	Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Pages	127-135
Number of pages	9
ISBN (Electronic)	9781351612524
ISBN (Print)	9781138089341
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109251
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2018
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 selection and editorial matter, David Boud, Rola Ajjawi, Phillip Dawson and Joanna Tai.

Access to Document

10.4324/9781315109251

Cite this

@inbook{4786355d2a1544bea4e7f5b091f2af4d,

title = "The practicalities of using assessment management to develop evaluative judgement",

abstract = "However worthy the theoretical principles of evaluative judgment are, they are worthless unless they are also practicable. This is particularly challenging in a higher education sector that is increasingly dominated by modularisation and massification. This chapter considers some of the questions we need to address in order to develop efficient and effective technical solutions that support the development of students' evaluative judgement at scale and across even the most complex degree programmes.",

author = "Cath Ellis",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 selection and editorial matter, David Boud, Rola Ajjawi, Phillip Dawson and Joanna Tai.",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.4324/9781315109251",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781138089341",

pages = "127--135",

booktitle = "Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The practicalities of using assessment management to develop evaluative judgement

AU - Ellis, Cath

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - However worthy the theoretical principles of evaluative judgment are, they are worthless unless they are also practicable. This is particularly challenging in a higher education sector that is increasingly dominated by modularisation and massification. This chapter considers some of the questions we need to address in order to develop efficient and effective technical solutions that support the development of students' evaluative judgement at scale and across even the most complex degree programmes.

AB - However worthy the theoretical principles of evaluative judgment are, they are worthless unless they are also practicable. This is particularly challenging in a higher education sector that is increasingly dominated by modularisation and massification. This chapter considers some of the questions we need to address in order to develop efficient and effective technical solutions that support the development of students' evaluative judgement at scale and across even the most complex degree programmes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048799478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315109251

DO - 10.4324/9781315109251

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85048799478

SN - 9781138089341

SP - 127

EP - 135

BT - Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education

PB - Taylor and Francis Ltd.

ER -

The practicalities of using assessment management to develop evaluative judgement

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this