TY - JOUR
T1 - The public and a radiological or nuclear emergency event : threat perception, preparedness, and anticipated response : findings from a preliminary study in Sydney, Australia
AU - Taylor, Mel
AU - Joung, Wendy
AU - Griffin, Barbara
AU - Hill, David
AU - Chisari, Robert
AU - Hesketh, Beryl
AU - Raphael, Beverley
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This paper presents selected findings from a preliminary study that sought to assess the impacts of a radiological or nuclear emergency event on an Australian population, and their anticipated responses to such an event. The questionnaire was wide-ranging and included sections on threat perception, preparedness, use of media sources and trusted organisations, as well as socio-demographic, personal resilience and health-related data. Survey data were collected from samples of the general public living in Sydney, Australia during the period May-June 2008 using a mixed convenience sample approach (n=324). In general, data suggest that the public is not highly concerned about terrorism involving radiological or nuclear materials and is unprepared for such an event. First Responders (Fire, Police, Ambulance) and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) were the authorities the public had most confidence in to respond to such incidents and these were also the agencies the public was most likely to trust for credible information. When respondents were prompted with a series of possible behaviours they might elicit in the event of a radiological or nuclear emergency incident, their immediate most likely responses included calling family members to check they are OK, washing off radioactive material, seeking shelter indoors, calling emergency services, covering their mouth to prevent inhalation of dust, and trying to get back home. Longer-term behaviours included having more frequent health checks. These findings suggest that there would be high demand on telecommunication services soon after such an event, and the general lack of preparedness of the public suggests that there would be a high degree of confusion and uncertainty in their responses. This emphasises the importance of timely communication and direction following such an event, preferably delivered by one of the authorities most trusted by the public.
AB - This paper presents selected findings from a preliminary study that sought to assess the impacts of a radiological or nuclear emergency event on an Australian population, and their anticipated responses to such an event. The questionnaire was wide-ranging and included sections on threat perception, preparedness, use of media sources and trusted organisations, as well as socio-demographic, personal resilience and health-related data. Survey data were collected from samples of the general public living in Sydney, Australia during the period May-June 2008 using a mixed convenience sample approach (n=324). In general, data suggest that the public is not highly concerned about terrorism involving radiological or nuclear materials and is unprepared for such an event. First Responders (Fire, Police, Ambulance) and the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) were the authorities the public had most confidence in to respond to such incidents and these were also the agencies the public was most likely to trust for credible information. When respondents were prompted with a series of possible behaviours they might elicit in the event of a radiological or nuclear emergency incident, their immediate most likely responses included calling family members to check they are OK, washing off radioactive material, seeking shelter indoors, calling emergency services, covering their mouth to prevent inhalation of dust, and trying to get back home. Longer-term behaviours included having more frequent health checks. These findings suggest that there would be high demand on telecommunication services soon after such an event, and the general lack of preparedness of the public suggests that there would be a high degree of confusion and uncertainty in their responses. This emphasises the importance of timely communication and direction following such an event, preferably delivered by one of the authorities most trusted by the public.
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/540070
UR - http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=20110617;res=AGISPT
M3 - Article
SN - 1324-1540
VL - 26
SP - 31
EP - 39
JO - Australian Journal of Emergency Management
JF - Australian Journal of Emergency Management
IS - 1
ER -