The R18+ games debate : a critical analysis of the arguments

Elizabeth Handsley, Wayne Warburton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 1995, representatives of all the Australian governments decided that computer games above MA15+ should not be allowed. Such material is 'refused classification' which means it cannot legally be distributed in this country. In spite of these restrictions, video game sales in Australia have typically been worth $1.3-2.05 billion per year in recent years. This year, the State Attorneys- General and the federal Minister for Home Affairs have been reviewing this position, in the process of which they have run a public consultation calling for submissions. There has been substantial pressure from those who play and distribute games to liberalise the law. A concerted campaign saw some 50,000 submissions put to the consultation in favour of liberalisation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-49
Number of pages6
JournalViewpoint
Volume4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • computer games
  • classification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The R18+ games debate : a critical analysis of the arguments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this