Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The regulatory tide begins to rise against greenwashing - 'ASIC v Vanguard investments'

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Earlier this year, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) was successful in the first set of civil penalty proceedings for greenwashing to achieve a court outcome, in 'Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd'. In this case the Federal Court found that Vanguard Investments had breached sections 12DB(1)(a) and (e) and 12DF(1) of the 'Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001' (Cth) due to misleading claims that it made about certain environmental, social and governance (ESG) exclusionary screens applied to investments in an index fund. The decision in 'ASIC v Vanguard Investments' is important, not simply because it represents a “win” for ASIC in its first court outcome in greenwashing proceedings, but because it also confirms that general principles relating to misleading and deceptive conduct apply to greenwashing claims.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)333-338
    Number of pages4
    JournalCompany and Securities Law Journal
    Volume40
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - 2024

    Notes

    WIP MM TBA

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The regulatory tide begins to rise against greenwashing - 'ASIC v Vanguard investments''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this