The reliability and validity of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping for muscles under active contraction

Rapid mapping is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) mapping method which can significantly reduce data collection time compared to traditional approaches. However, its validity and reliability has only been established for upper-limb muscles during resting-state activity. Here, we determined the validity and reliability of rapid mapping for non-upper limb muscles that require active contraction during TMS: the masseter and quadriceps muscles. Eleven healthy participants attended two sessions, spaced two hours apart, each involving rapid and 'traditional' mapping of the masseter muscle and three quadriceps muscles (rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis). Map parameters included map volume, map area and centre of gravity (CoG) in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions. Low to moderate measurement errors (%SEMeas = 10-32) were observed across muscles. Relative reliability varied from good-to-excellent (ICC"‰="‰0.63-0.99) for map volume, poor-to-excellent (ICC"‰="‰0.11-0.86) for map area, and fair-to-excellent for CoG (ICC"‰="‰0.25-0.8) across muscles. There was Bayesian evidence of equivalence (BF's"‰>"‰3) in most map outcomes between rapid and traditional maps across all muscles, supporting the validity of the rapid mapping method. Overall, rapid TMS mapping produced similar estimates of map parameters to the traditional method, however the reliability results were mixed. As mapping of non-upper limb muscles is relatively challenging, rapid mapping is a promising substitute for traditional mapping, however further work is required to refine this method.