The reliability of profiling within the workplace : a comparison of two personality measures

Geoffrey Chapman

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study aims to examine the test-retest reliability of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Instinctive Drives SystemTM in order to determine their effectiveness in the workplace. It was hypothesised that the Instinctive Drives System"' would demonstrate significantly higher test-retest reliability. The study consisted of 50 participants, who completed both personality measures twice. Unlike previous studies which only compare test-retest reliability by examining the averages of the entire sample, this study directly compared changes in individual scores. The Instinctive Drives SystemTM was found to be significantly more likely to return reliable results than the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. The results of this study provide valuable information for business managers interested in improving performance through personality profiling in the workplace.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 22nd ANZAM Conference 2008: Managing in the Pacific Century: 2-5 December 2008, The University of Auckand, New Zealand
    PublisherAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Management
    Number of pages12
    ISBN (Print)1863081496
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    EventAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Mangement. International Conference -
    Duration: 2 Dec 2008 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Mangement. International Conference
    Period2/12/08 → …

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The reliability of profiling within the workplace : a comparison of two personality measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this